401(k) Changes to DBA Plan, pg. 3

Compare Smith Barney Performance with Other Providers

Period: 1 June 1996 thru 31 May 1999
Funds
- 25% each Large Growth, Small Growth, and Large Value
- 15% International
- 5% each Money Market, Corporate Bond
Past performance is only a clue to future performance
(no one can predict what the next 3 years will bring)

3-Year Raw Numbers

Performance Total
Gain Fee

Smith Barney TRAK $33.984 41.6% $1,243

Provider #1 $44,700 86.2% $636

Provider #2 $41,419 72.6% $728

Provider #3 $37,974 58.2% $599

Provider #4 $35,982 49.9% $343

Provider #5 $37,757 57.3% $586

Provider #6 $39,257 63.6% $654

The Total Gain column is computed by
(performance-24000)/24000 * 100%.

Published by Lotus® Freelance Graphics®

Accesses since 5 July 1999

Authored by Rich Franzen

3-Year Raw Numbers
	Performance	Total Gain	Fee
Smith Barney TRAK	$33.984	41.6%	$1,243
Provider #1	$44,700	86.2%	$636
Provider #2	$41,419	72.6%	$728
Provider #3	$37,974	58.2%	$599
Provider #4	$35,982	49.9%	$343
Provider #5	$37,757	57.3%	$586
Provider #6	$39,257	63.6%	$654
The Total Gain column is computed by `(performance-24000)/24000 * 100%`.